Legal Opinion

Vromania Apartments Co. v. Goodman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. E. Withrow, Judge. (1) In the absence of an express undertaking to that effect, a landlord is not hound to keep the demised premises in tenantable repair, and it is no defense to a suit for rent agreed upon that the building had become dilapidated and unsafe so that tenant was compelled to leave it. Burnes v. Fuchs, 28 M'o. App. 279; Eoberts v. Cottey, 100 Mo. App. 503; Johnson v. Snow, 102 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jas. E. Withrow, Judge. (1) In the absence of an express undertaking to that effect, a landlord is not hound to keep the demised premises in tenantable repair, and it is no defense to a suit for rent agreed upon that the building had become dilapidated and unsafe so that tenant was compelled to leave it. Burnes v. Fuchs, 28 M'o. App. 279; Eoberts v. Cottey, 100 Mo. App. 503; Johnson v. Snow, 102 Mo. App. 241; Eutledge v. Quinlan, 127 Mo. App. 419; Mfg. Co. v. O’Eeilly, 197 Mo. 476. (2) A constructive eviction of the landlord by his tenant,…

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

Plaintiff corporation owns a large apartment building in the city of St. Louis, in which, by a lease dated October 15, 1906, it let to defendant a first-floor suite or apartment for five years from said date, at a rental of one hundred dollars a month in advance. At that time the building had just been completed. Defendant occupied the apartment in comfort *657until some time in the ensuing February, when the plaster on the ceilings and walls began to crack and give way. He called the attention of plaintiff’s vice-president to the faults, which progressively grew worse until, in the spring, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benoist v. Darby ex rel. CamdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  2. Cady v. CoatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Nicholson v. RombauerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Ver Steeg v. Becker-Moore Paint Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A. Graf Distilling Co. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Dolph v. BarryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Smith v. RodickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Barr v. HaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Ray Realty Co. v. HoltzmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API