Legal Opinion

Cady v. Coates

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Texas Circuit Court.— Ron. L. B. Wood-side, Judge. Again we say tire Coates-Cady contract was made with direct reference to the primary contract with the exposition company, and so far as its terms regulated what was to he done by Coates on the exposition grounds in the exercise of the concession granted by it, it was as much a part of the Coates-Cady contract as though it had .been written into it.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Texas Circuit Court.— Ron. L. B. Wood-side, Judge. Again we say tire Coates-Cady contract was made with direct reference to the primary contract with the exposition company, and so far as its terms regulated what was to he done by Coates on the exposition grounds in the exercise of the concession granted by it, it was as much a part of the Coates-Cady contract as though it had .been written into it. Calloway v. Henderson, 130 Mo. 77; Carr v. Lucldand, 112 Mo. 462. (1) The only assignment of error as appears from the motion for a new trial being that the verdict is not sustained by…

1Opinion of the Court

GOODE, J'.

In the year 1896, plaintiff leased to the defendant the Dellone Hotel and furniture in the city of Omaha, Nebraska, for a term to commence July 20th, of that year, and to end December 31, 1898. The rent was paid, except for the months of September and October, 1898, and the purpose of this action is to recover $1,607 owing for those months. The defendant denied that he owed that much and set up four counterclaims in his own behalf. One of these was for *149money expended in advertising the hotel, one-half of which the defendant alleges the plaintiff agreed to repay ; another was for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Christian v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Berkson v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. Hill v. Meyer Brothers' Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Pope v. RamseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Hall v. GoodnightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A. Graf Distilling Co. v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Vromania Apartments Co. v. GoodmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Forest v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Creelman Lumber Co. v. DeLisleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Young v. EmmkeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API