Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rodick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1956No. 22298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for money had and received. Plaintiffs recovered a verdict and judgment for $1,550. Defendants were granted a new trial and plaintiffs have appealed.

In substance plaintiffs’ petition alleged! that they agreed to purchase and defendants agreed to sell for $6,200 certain steel forms intended for use in the construction of concrete dwelling houses; that for the purchase price plaintiffs paid to defendants $1,550 in cash, and executed two promissory notes payable to defendants, the face amount of one note being $4,696.50, the other $827.75; that defendants failed and refused to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jordan v. St. Joseph Railway, Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Keyes v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Mickel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Jameson v. FoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Weisels-Gerhardt Real Estate Co. v. Pemberton Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flanigan v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Endermuehle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Johnson v. Estate of GirvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Williams v. KaestnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Schulte v. CritesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API