Legal Opinion

Skates v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 111PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPoster, J.

We will restate a.few principles’of law as preliminary to a consideration of the legal questions involved in rulings on the pleading in this case, for there are no other assignments of error except to such rulings.

The rule is that while an action at law will not lie between the members of an unliquidated partnership to recover for any unsettled amount claimed as due one by the other, on account of the partnership mattej, such a suit may be maintained for the contribution to the capital of the partnership furnished’by one at the instance of the other. Scott v. Campbell, 30 Ala. 728; Penn v.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parker v. BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Jefferson County Savings Bank v. ComptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Perkins v. SkatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Davenport & Harris Undertaking Co. v. RobersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Spencer v. Blanke Mfg. & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Skates v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API