Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Skates

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1929No. 6 Div. 330PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

John Skates entered intb a contract in writing with Joseph Burnett & Co., of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, through O. D. Perkins, signing his name as salesman, for the purchase of “one hundred ‘Perfect’ 1-2-3 gum-vending machines with 2,500 balls of gum.” Price, $24 each. Terms, cash. The contract, in form an order, signed by both parties, contained certain guaranties by the vendor, and the following stipulations:

“This OTder and agreement is complete within itself, and is not subject to cancellation nor to any agreements other than contained herein.
“Remarks: Title of said machines to remain in O. D.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bingham v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Oden v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Crews v. ThreadgillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Sumner v. WoodsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Barton v. W. O. Broyles Stove & Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bern v. RosenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Utility Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  3. Intertype Corporation v. PulverDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
  4. Spencer v. S. Boyd, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Bern v. RosenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API