Legal Opinion

United States v. ONE 1971 CHEVROLET CORVETTE, ETC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-145PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LUONGO, District Judge.

This is an action brought by the government pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 781 et seq., for forfeiture of an automobile. At the close of the hearing in this matter, oral findings of fact were made and I granted the parties additional time to submit memoranda of law as to whether these findings warranted a forfeiture decree. A brief summary of the facts, earlier found, follows:

Claimants Morey and Susan Fisher, husband and wife, are owners as tenants by the entireties under Pennsylvania law of a 1971 Chevrolet Corvette automobile. The vehicle was purchased with Mrs.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. ONE 1981 DATSUN 280ZXDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In re MagliscoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. State v. 1979 Pontiac Trans AmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. United States v. One 1976 Lincoln Mark IV, Serial 6Y89A876578 Michigan License TWP 951District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. State v. One 1984 Toyota TruckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API