Legal Opinion
Welch v. T. W. Warner Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 5, 1931No. 134PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff filed his complaint at law in the state court upon a contract between his assignor, Andrews, and the defendant company. The defendant removed the cause for diversity of citizenship and answered. When the cause came on for trial in the District Court, the plaintiff moved to amend the complaint, and Judge Coleman sent the cause to the motion part, at which Judge Woolsey refused to allow the amendment and dismissed the original complaint for insufficiency on its face. From the judgment so entered the plaintiff appealed. The appeal therefore involves the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland Rolling Mill v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Filley v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Crocker First Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. De SousaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Timken Carriage Co. v. C. S. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Gunderson v. BreyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Societe Vinicole De Champagne v. Mumm Champagne & Importation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- T. W. Warner Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Arrow Mill Development Corp. v. ShopRite of Clinton (In Re Arrow Mill Development Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Bickford's, Inc. v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- T. W. Warner Co. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.