Legal Opinion
Bickford's, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
The bill of complaint is dismissed on the merits without leave to amend. The defendants may each have costs.
I. This is a suit in equity, by which the' plaintiff seeks to impress a trust on the proceeds of certain checks, amounting to $99,-166,45.
II. The plaintiff is a corporation of New York, as is the defendant the Bank of United States. The defendant Joseph A. Broderick is a citizen of New York. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is one of the regional hanks created under the Federal Reserve System.
As both the Bank of United States and the defendant Broderick, at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Emery v. FowlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
- Kane v. First Nat. Bank of El Paso, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Bailey v. SundbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
- Emma Silver Mining Co. v. Emma Silver Mining Co. of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1880
- In re JarmulowskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation of the Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. C. v. A. B. C. Fireproof Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936