Legal Opinion

F & M Marquette National Bank v. Richards

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1985No. Civ. 4-84-1284, 4-85-104PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILES W. LORD, Chief Judge.

These companion cases are timely appeals of adversary proceedings from the bankruptcy court filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158. In dispute is the bankruptcy court’s interpretation of what Bankruptcy Rule controls the time deadline for creditors filing their objections to debtor’s dis-chargeability of debts under section 523(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy court held that Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c) requires creditors to file their objections within sixty days of the first meeting of creditors scheduled to take place in a bankruptcy proceeding. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. F & M Marquette National Bank v. Richards (In Re Richards)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
  2. Bill Doran Co. v. Cail (In Re Cail)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Francis v. Riso (In Re Riso)District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986
  2. F & M Marquette National Bank v. Keith R. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. In Re MaherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1985
  4. Industrial Financial Corp. v. Falk (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  5. Oak Hollow South Associates v. Cortes (In Re Cortes)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API