Legal Opinion
Bill Doran Co. v. Cail (In Re Cail)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 24, 1984No. 19-05663PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD N. DeGUNTHER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of the Debtors, Franklin Cail and Rosemary Cail, to Dismiss the Complaint of Bill Doran Co. to Determine the Dischargeability of a Debt Under Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors are represented by Attorney Joseph Olsen. The Plaintiff is represented by Attorney John Olson.
The Debtors filed a Chapter 11 case on August 24, 1983. Rule 4007(c) requires that a Complaint to Determine Discharge-ability be filed not later than 60 days following the first date set for the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- F & M Marquette National Bank v. Keith R. RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- In the Matter of Spiro Pavlovich, Debtor. Bank of Louisiana v. Spiro PavlovichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- F & M Marquette National Bank v. Richards (In Re Richards)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
- Industrial Financial Corp. v. Falk (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- F & M Marquette National Bank v. RichardsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.