Merriam v. West
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Thomas E. Elcock, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action upon a promissory note, negotiable in form, by an indorsee claiming to be a holder in due course. There was a trial to the court, a general finding and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.
The defense was that the note was given for an illegal consideration and that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course.
The note was given for a one sixty-fourth interest in an oil and gas lease. As the evidence disclosed that the seller was syndicating an oil lease yet to be developed, the statute (Laws of 1919,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nyhart v. KubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Westhusin v. Landowners Oil Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Fitch v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Wigington v. Mid-Continent Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- Weisendanger v. LindSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Thomas v. United Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.