Aritex Land Co. v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee, Vivian Arnold, initiated this action in the Superior Court of Pima County to recover a broker’s fee on the sale of defendant’s property in Texas. Defendant-appellant, Aritex, an Arizona corporation, counterclaimed for return of the portion of the broker’s fee that had been paid to plaintiff, alleging fraud and illegal contract because plaintiff and her agents were not licensed real estate brokers or salesmen in Texas.
On 7 December 1970, the court entered a written judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $40,637.50, plus interest and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Tillman v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Fornara v. WolpeArizona Supreme Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coldwell Banker & Company v. Merlin KarlockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982