Legal Opinion

Estate of Guernsey v. Pennington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1904No. 4,977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Lake Circuit Court; H. S. Barr, Special Judge. Action by William Pennington on a claim against the estate of Chester Guernsey. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, C. J.

Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal, for the reasons that the record fails to show that the *120appeal is prosecuted by any proper person, and that the assignment of errors does not contain the full names of tbe parties. Appellee’s objection is well taken. It is a well-established rule in the courts of appeal in this State that the estate of a dead man can not be a party to an action without some representative. To this effect are the’ following decisions: Estate of Peden v. Noland, 45 Ind. 354; Estate of Wells v. Wells, 71 Ind. 509; Estate of Thomas v. Service, 90 Ind. 128; Dunn v. Estate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Estate of Wells v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Estate of Peden v. NolandIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Estate of Thomas v. ServiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Dunn v. Estate of EvansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Estate of AckenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Wilson v. Estate of WL KingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Potomac Insurance v. BolesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1962
  4. Estate of Gordon v. NicholsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. State ex rel. Mental Health Commissioner v. Estate of HeitheckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API