Legal Opinion

Estate of Peden v. Noland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Madison Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

The names in the assignment of errors are stated thus': “ The Estate of Joseph Peden, deceased, v. William W. Noland.” The first rule of this court requires that the full names of the parties shall be contained in the assignment of errors. 32 Ind.

*355The estate of Joseph Peden, deceased, is not the full name of any natural or artificial party or person. We cannot render judgment against an estate, but we may against an administrator or executor of an estate. The assignment of error is not signed by the estate, or any person for it. The assignment of error is a pleading in this court, and must be…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Davis v. PelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wilson v. Estate of WL KingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Estate of Thomas v. ServiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Haney v. Estate of DennyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API