Legal Opinion

Estate of Thomas v. Service

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,111PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the LaPorte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

— The appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal, for the reason that the assignment of errors does not conform to Rule 1 of this court, which requires that “ The assignment of errors shall contain the full names of the parties,” etc.

For names of parties, this assignment contains the following:

“In the Matter of the Glaim of George Service v. The Estate of William Thomas.

“The appellant, the Estate of William Thomas, deceased, for assignment of errors in said cause, says,” etc.. Under former decisions of this court, this is not a compliance with the rule. Estate of Peden v. Noland, 45…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Peden v. NolandIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Henderson v. HallidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. State ex rel. Childers v. DelanoIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Kiley v. PerrinIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whisler v. WhislerIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Bacon v. WithrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wilson v. Estate of WL KingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Haney v. Estate of DennyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. McConahey's Estate v. FosterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API