Legal Opinion
Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1996No. C4-95-2578PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from a grant of summary judgment to respondent Allen Cormier, arguing Cormier is not entitled to stack no-fault benefits covering vehicles which he did not occupy at the time of his injuries and under which he was not an insured. Because the owner of the vehicle chose to stack basic economic loss benefits and Cormier was insured under the policy in which the owner chose to stack, we affirm.
FACTS
The facts of this case are not in dispute. On June 10,1993, sixteen-year-old Allen Cor-mier was a passenger in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Meister v. Western National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. SeefeldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Koons v. National Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996