Legal Opinion
Vartan v. Harristown Development Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1987No. Civ. A. 84-1395PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction.
Defendants, Harristown Development Corporation (Corporation) and William Keisling, have filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, John 0. Vartan, filed this lawsuit against the moving defendants as well as the City of Harrisburg, the Harrisburg Redevelopment Authority (HRA), HRA’s chairman, Bernard Hammer, and Harrisburg’s mayor, Stephen R. Reed. 1 Vartan alleged that the defendants had conspired to monopolize or restrain trade in the redevelopment of downtown Harrisburg in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, and the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hoover v. RonwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City Communications, Inc. v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Vartan v. Harristown Development Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Coles v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Erie Builders Concrete Co. v. Erie-Western Pennsylvania Port AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
- Harristown Development Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.