Legal Opinion

Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1939No. Customs Appeals 4222, 4223, 4232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

In these three cases the First Division of the United States Customs Court overruled all the protests of the importers, and from its judgments in so doing appellants have appealed to this court. The three cases were briefed and argued together and require but one opinion for their decision.

In Customs Appeal No. 4222, the merchandise was imported from Japan; in Customs Appeal No. 4223 from Norway, and in Customs Appeal No. 4232 from Austria and Japan. The merchandise (a detailed description of which is not necessary) was entered in 1935 and 1936 and was, in all three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Pigeon River Improvement, Slide & Boom Co. v. Charles W. Cox, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. B. Altman & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Bartram v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States (Bruno Scheidt, Inc., Party in Interest)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. State v. . BlantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API