Legal Opinion

Pigeon River Improvement, Slide & Boom Co. v. Charles W. Cox, Ltd.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 15, 1934No. 126PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

Pigeon River Improvement, Slide & Boom. Company, a Minnesota corporation, brought this action against Charles W. Cox, Limited, a Canadian corporation, to recover tolls for the use of improvements which the Minnesota corporation had made in the Pigeon River. These improvements embraced sluiceways, booms and dams, which were used by the defendant in driving, sluicing and floating timber products. The case was removed to the federal court, a demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained without leave further to amend, and the judgment of dismissal was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  4. Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. DionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Moser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Franklin Mint Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API