In re the Marriage of Fay
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.
Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, challenging the trial court’s property division and decision to award wife a portion of her attorney fees. Husband contends that the court unjustly required him to pay certain debts without giving him a balancing award of other property. He also argues that the court improperly awarded attorney fees without giving him an adequate opportunity to object to the amount of fees that wife requested. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dividing the property as it did. See Kunze and Kunze, 337 Or 122, 136, 92 P3d 100 (2004)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- McDougal v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- In re the Marriage of ShlitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In re the Marriage of BranscombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Marriage of MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Hostetler v. HostetlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018