Legal Opinion

Mesa County National Bank v. Berry

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1913No. 3898PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Mesa District Court. Hon. Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Presiding Judge.

The controversy out of which this case arose involves certain household goods valued at about $600. These goods were formerly the prqperty of Sherman W. Moody, a jeweler at Grand Junction, and the principal stockholder of the Moody Jewelry Company. The goods were located in Moody’s home, which had been leased, furnished, to Berry, the defendant in error. Moody and the Moody Jewelry Company were heavily indebted to the plaintiff in error, The Mesa County National Bank. To satisfy this debt Moody had caused an assignment to be made of the jewelry company stock, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tenney v. . BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Bartlett v. Odd FelLows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Webb v. TresconyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Baldwin v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SemmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enos v. KeatingWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Divine v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  3. Hall v. OrloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Gooding v. LyonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  5. Seibert v. SeibertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API