Legal Opinion
Loginter S.A. Y Parque Industrial Agua Profunda S.A. UTE v. M/V Nobility
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 10, 2001No. CIV.A. WMN-00-3448PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
This admiralty action is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions and one party’s unopposed motion for summary judgment. The motions are fully briefed and ripe for decision. Upon a review of the pleadings and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6.
I. BACKGROUND
The parties’ motions, involving no fewer than eight entities from seven countries, present the Court with a virtual “world tour” through the waters-and laws-of many nations. Plaintiffs in this action claim that they have maritime liens…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trans-Tec Asia v. M/V HARMONY CONTAINERCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dorsey v. TGT Consulting, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Allen v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Trans-Tec Asia v. M/V HARMONY CONTAINERDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005
- Triton Marine Fuels, Ltd. v. M/V Pacific ChukotkaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.