Legal Opinion

Foy v. Pratt & Whitney Group

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 29, 1997No. 1250PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

127 F.3d 229

156 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2418

Claudia FOY, Mary E. Nelson, Betty Bradley, Ida Haynes,

Donna Berger, Grace Ouellette, Edna Edwards,

Barbara Hatcher, Mattie Jones, And

Clayborne E. Cullen,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

PRATT & WHITNEY GROUP, An unincorporated division of United

Technologies Corporation, Gerald Mudd, Vincent

Scarpetti, And John Lawlor, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 1250, Docket No. 96-9037.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued April 21, 1997.

Decided Sept. 29, 1997.

Stefan Underhill, Hartford, CT (Albert Zakarian, Day, Berry & Howard, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellees.

Befo…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Vera v. Saks & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Beckman v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Golnik v. AmatoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
  5. Salamea v. MacY's East, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API