Legal Opinion · Dissent

Munro v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1943No. Nos. 4718, 4722Published

1Dissent

Because to our minds, it follows as night the day that liability in damages results for breach of the very same duty whose performance may be compelled by mandamus (State ex rel. Lynch v. District Court, 41 N.M. 658, 73 P.2d 333, 113 A.L.R. 746 and Gray v. City of Santa Fe, 10 Cir., 89 F.2d 406; Id., 135 F.2d 374), namely, the city's statutory and contractual duty to foreclose punctually delinquent paving assessments, more especially where the obligor is a trustee (Hodges v. City of Roswell, 31 N.M. 384, 247 P. 310; State ex rel. Ackerman v. City of Carlsbad, 39 N.M. 352, 47 P.2d 865; State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of McKinley CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Ackerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Gray v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. Hodges v. City of RoswellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gray v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API