Legal Opinion

The Texas Co. v. Wax and So. Sur. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action on a supersedeas bond.

The petition alleges that plaintiff, the Texas Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and authorized to do business in the State of Missouri; that defendant, Southern Surety Company of New York, is a corporation organized under the laws of New York, and engaged in the business of executing indemnity and surety bonds for hire: that on February 9, 1928, plaintiff instituted an action of unlawful detainer against defendant, David Wax, before a justice of the peace in the City of St. Louis, for the recovery of certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Bernecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Wilcox v. DanielsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moffat Tunnel Improvement District v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Wilkerson v. GibbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Knapp v. FredricksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. Spickard v. Continental Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API