Legal Opinion
Moffat Tunnel Improvement District v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 2, 1936No. 51PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Speakman, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The condition contained in the bond sued upon in this action is “that if the said Eastern Union Company of Delaware, Incorporated, its successors or assigns, or any of them, shall prosecute the said suit with effect, or shall pay any and all costs which may be awarded to the said, The Moffat Tunnel Improvement District, together with any and all damages not exceeding the sum of Five Thousand Dollars, ($5000.00), the amount of this bond, which the said The Moffat Tunnel Improvement District may have sustained in said suit by reason of such attach*478…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Babbitt v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kasson v. Estate of BrockerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Riley v. MitchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Lawlor v. MerrittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Seaford v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. GreggDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Knapp v. FredricksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
- Walsh v. Hotel Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Walsh v. Hotel Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967