Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Harrington

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1902PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Adair Circuit Court. — Hon. N. M. Shelton, Judge. (1) An instrument. purporting to be the bond of a corporation, to be operative as such, must be signed by the ■corporation, or by an agent whose authority is under seal, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Nichols v. St. Louis Circuit Court, 1 Mo. 357; St. Louis Dairy Co. v. Sauer, 16 Mo. App. 1; Corbin v. Laswell, 48 Mo. App. 626; Perry v. Price, 1 Mo. 664; South Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Adair Circuit Court. — Hon. N. M. Shelton, Judge. (1) An instrument. purporting to be the bond of a corporation, to be operative as such, must be signed by the ■corporation, or by an agent whose authority is under seal, and the corporate seal must be affixed. Nichols v. St. Louis Circuit Court, 1 Mo. 357; St. Louis Dairy Co. v. Sauer, 16 Mo. App. 1; Corbin v. Laswell, 48 Mo. App. 626; Perry v. Price, 1 Mo. 664; South Mo. Land Co. v. Jeffries, 40 Mo-. App. 360; Sandford v. Tremlett, 42 Mo. 384. (2) The bond was •given to H. P. Hanlin. The petition shows a suit in the name of M. D.…

1Opinion of the CourtBroadens, J.

— It appears from the record in this case that on the twenty-sixth of October, 1898, one H. P. Hanlin procured a judgment for $500 against the Omaha, Kansas City and Eastern Railroad Company, in the circuit court of Adair county, Missouri; that on the succeeding day, October 27, said Hanlin in writing assigned said judgment to respondent and one J. M. Ivie; that on the twenty-fourth of March, 1900, said Ivie assigned his interest in said judgment, also to the respondent, and on said last-named day said Hanlin executed another writing whereby he assigned all his interest in said judgment to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Babbitt v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Gibbs v. BartlettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Bauer v. CabanneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Lanier v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Gould v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1829

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hahs v. Cape Girardeau & Chester RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. The Texas Co. v. Wax and So. Sur. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Hill v. KellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Pierson, Rec. v. Republic Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. W. J. Donnelly Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API