Marriage of Allan v. Allan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, their dissolution decree set child support at 30% of respondent Bradford Taylor Alan’s net income. In this post-decree proceeding, Arlene Berenson Allan appeals from the district court’s order setting child support at a specific dollar amount that does not reflect the percentage formula. Appellant also challenges the district court’s determinations on arrearages, discovery, and attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
FACTS
The parties were married in 1978 and had two children. The marriage was dissolved in 1987.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moylan v. MoylanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Rutten v. RuttenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Solon v. SolonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Marriage of Taflin v. TaflinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Gilbertson v. GraffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Linn v. Delaware Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Marriage of Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001