Marriage of Williams v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Judge.
In this child-support modification proceeding, appellant husband argues that the district court improperly modified child support to include 30% of all future sub-chapter S corporation (SSC) distributions. Respondent wife argues the district court improperly denied her request to find husband in arrears for failure to pay 30% of past SSC distributions and improperly declined to convert husband’s child-support obligation from a percentage of income to a specific dollar amount. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
The marriage of appellant-husband Donald J. Williams and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marriage of Allan v. AllanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993