Legal Opinion

Marriage of Williams v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 2001No. C5-01-705Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Judge.

In this child-support modification proceeding, appellant husband argues that the district court improperly modified child support to include 30% of all future sub-chapter S corporation (SSC) distributions. Respondent wife argues the district court improperly denied her request to find husband in arrears for failure to pay 30% of past SSC distributions and improperly declined to convert husband’s child-support obligation from a percentage of income to a specific dollar amount. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

The marriage of appellant-husband Donald J. Williams and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Allan v. AllanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API