State v. Ziegler
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
— Ernest Ziegler appeals his conviction for first degree statutory rape alleging, inter alia, that the trial court erred in admitting laboratory tests as business records. We hold that laboratory reports contained in the medical files of a physician, when the physician ordered the laboratory test and relied upon the test results in treating the patient, constitute part of the business records of the physician admissible into evidence under the Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act (hereinafter UBRA), RCW 5.45.020. We affirm and remand for resentencing.
Facts
In April 1983, Ernest Ziegler and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. BelgardeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Sears v. Grange Insurance Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DeVriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.