Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. Pulley v. Scott

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 16, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

An information in the nature of a quo warranto was filed on June 4, 1921, in the Circuit Court of Clinton County, by the then prosecuting attorney of that county, by leave of court obtained, and at the relation of certain taxpayers and citizens of the school districts hereinafter mentioned, which, after alleging the existence, on April 3, 1917, of the School District of Lathrop and of Common School Districts Nos. 44 and 45, charged that respondents were "acting and using illegally the offices and franchises as school directors" of "Lathrop School District," and were claiming without any legal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex inf. Major v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. State ex inf. Crow v. FlemingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Patterson v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ChampSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. School Dist.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. England v. EckleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Hutsell v. ChipleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API