Legal Opinion

Farmer v. George

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1986No. 84-90112; CA A37345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an “Order Supplementing Judgment Regarding Costs,” 1 which disallowed his statement for costs and disbursements with respect to his claim for reasonable attorney fees. The issue is whether an action for fraud based on fraudulent misrepresentations is an “action for damages for an injury or wrong to the person or property, or both, of another” within the meaning of ORS 20.080. We hold that it is and reverse.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the difference between the price he paid for a 1981 automobile and the automobile’s value had defendant not falsely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Cox v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Dolan v. Continental Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Roberts v. Gray's Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steele v. a & B Automotive & Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Barnes v. LacknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Mitchell v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API