Legal Opinion

Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 30, 2006No. 55049-7-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Schindler, J.

— Sprint Spectrum, L.P./Sprint PCS (Sprint) sells cellular service and equipment to customers throughout the United States. As a cellular business, Sprint is subject to the city of Seattle’s telephone business utility tax. Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) ch. 5.48. The telephone utility tax is based on the total gross income from Sprint’s cellular business activity in Seattle. “Gross income” is defined as “the value proceeding or accruing from the sale of tangible property or service, and receipts (including all sums earned or charged, whether received or not). . . .” SMC…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sprint Spectrum v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of ChristCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. City of Woodinville v. Northshore United Church of ChristCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API