Legal Opinion

Ray v. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Potter. Tried below before Hon. Ira Webster.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

Appellant and others in the service of the appellee Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Company were engaged in transferring a large iron boiler from a pump house to an engine house situated in the yards of the company named, in Amarillo, Texas, across a switch track extending alongside said engine house. As a roadway for the rollers upon which said boiler was moved, heavy planks were used. After crossing the' switch track, which was at a right angle, one of these planks had been left on or near the rail nearest the engine house in such manner or position as that it was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railroad v. UnderwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. International & Great Northern Railroad v. MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Interurban Ry. Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Ray v. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Trinity Valdey & N. Ry. Co. v. ScholzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Pecos River Railroad Co. v. LathamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API