Legal Opinion

Trinity Valdey & N. Ry. Co. v. Scholz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1919No. 376PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Liberty County; L. B. Hightower, Sr., Judge. Suit by Paul Scholz and another against the Trinity Valley & Northern Railway Company and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is a suit by Paul Scholz and his father, August Scholz, against the appellants, for personal injuries suffered by Paul Scholz on the line of the Trinity Valley & Northern Railway Company about the 1st of May, 1915. At that time Paul Scholz was a minor past 15 years of age, working occasionally for both of the defend-ants. On the day he was injured he was not in the employ of either of them. The Dayton Lumber Company had track privileges over the line of the railway company for the purpose of hauling logs. It had its own engines, cars, and employés. Under some kind of contract, the nature…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Haynes v. Kaleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Central & Montgomery Railroad v. Morris & CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cook v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. CulbersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas Interurban Ry. Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. International-Great Northern Railroad v. LucasTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Hicks v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. International-Great Northern R. v. LucasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API