Legal Opinion
Etienne v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 14, 2000No. Civ.A. 3:00CV1475SRUPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Kevin Etienne (“Etienne”), brought this action against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) seeking damages and other relief for alleged discrimination on the basis of his race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Etienne also pleaded causes of action under Connecticut common law for constructive discharge; intentional infliction of emotional distress; negligent infliction of emotional distress; and false imprisonment.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Montinieri v. Southern New England Telephone, Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bhakta v. County of MauiHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- De Sesto v. SlaineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians Ex Rel. Francis v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- McDonnell v. AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Sundby v. Marquee Funding Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2019