Legal Opinion

Ten Eyck v. Walsh

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 21, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To retain the mastership of inter vivos transfers and yet to steer a safe course just off the legislatorial shoals of inheritance taxation demands in these days a very high degree of foresight, circumspection, and skill. Many have explored, few have discovered the direction. Modern legislation and its interpretation have shifted considerable alluvium into the channels of avoidance of either income or death taxes.

Mr. Jay Ten Eyck, an experienced lawyer and banker, who died testate on October 21st, 1943, a resident of Maplewood, Essex County, New Jersey, at the age of 78 years, 11 months, was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In Re HugginsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1924
  3. Squier v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  4. In Re HartfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1937
  5. In Re O'NeillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HoughtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Johnson v. ZinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1947
  3. Estate of Berg v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1998
  4. Busch v. WalshNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  5. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API