Legal Opinion

State v. Fraser

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1967No. 40326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before us on appeal from a judgment of conviction pursuant to a plea of guilty to the crime of indecent assault. Defendant contends that he should have a new trial because of an alleged error in the information with reference to the date on which the offense was committed. He states that the offense was alleged to have been committed on June 13, 1965, a Sunday, “a day when it was impossible for him to commit the crime.” He claims that when he entered the plea of guilty he was “suffering from a genuine misapprehension of his legal position.” Apparently, it did not occur to him…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rinne v. GerberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. State v. KahnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Liimatainen ex rel. Liimatainen v. BoekenoogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Curry v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. State v. DufourSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Bolinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API