State v. Dufour
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury, tried in the district court for Polk county before Watts, J., and a jury, and convicted of the crime of keeping a disorderly house. Erom an order denying her motion for a new trial, she appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of keeping a disorderly house. The indictment charged the commission of the offense on the' seventeenth day of May, 1913, and continuously thereafter until date-of the indictment, viz., June 3, 1913. The court instructed the jury in substance that they might find the defendant guilty on proof that she kept a disorderly house at a time earlier than the time fixed in the indictment. Defendant contends that she could be convicted only upon proof of commission of the offense within the dates charged in the indictment. This is the only question in the case.
*452It…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State v. NewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Commonwealth v. PeretzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- State v. RenoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- State ex rel. Rinne v. GerberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. SnyderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Pueblo v. DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1943
- State v. FraserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.