Legal Opinion
In re: Michael Flynn
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 31, 2020No. 20-5143PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued August 11, 2020 Decided August 31, 2020 No. 20-5143 IN RE: MICHAEL T. FLYNN , PETITIONER On Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus Sidney Powell argued the cause for petitioner Michael T. Flynn. With her on the opposition to the petition for rehearing en banc were Molly McCann and Jesse R. Binnall. Jeffrey B. Wall, Acting Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for United States of America. With him on the response to the petition for rehearing en banc were Brian C. Rabbitt, Acting Assistant…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hampton Dellinger v. Scott BessentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
- In re: Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026
- In re: Elon Musk, in his official capacityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
- J.G.G. v. Donald Trump (EN BANC ORDER)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
- United States v. FlynnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.