Intermountain Eye & Laser Centers, P.L.L.C. v. Miller
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
Intermountain Eye and Laser Centers sued Dr. Mark Miller in October 2003 contending the doctor breached the terms of a “post-termination competition” provision in the parties’ employment agreement. After the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment the district court ruled Dr. Miller did not violate the terms of the non-compete provision because the non-compete period had expired, and, even if it had not, the terms of the non-compete provision were unreasonable and, therefore, unenforceable. The court granted Dr. Miller’s motion, denied Intermountain Eye’s motion,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jorgensen v. CoppedgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Lawrence v. HutchinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- MCG Therapy Group, LLC v. Maestre Rivera Y OtrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2026
- Best Hill Coalition v. HALKO, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.