State v. Langlois

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain her motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence.

We think the real question involved in this .appeal is simply this: Who inflicted the injury to Thomas Morris Uanglois that ruptured his small intestine which caused the infection which in turn caused his death?

It is fundamental law that the proof of a charge in a criminal case involves the proof of two distinct propositions: (1) That the act complained of was done, and (2) that it was done by the person or persons .charged and by none other. Proof of…