Legal Opinion

State v. Evans

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1985No. 847SC812PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*33WELLS, Judge.

Defendant argues only one assignment of error, challenging the denial of her motions to dismiss the charges against her. She argues several questions under the one assignment.

The evidentiary principles governing motions to dismiss are set out at length in State v. Earnhardt, 307 N.C. 62, 296 S.E. 2d 649 (1982). Briefly summarized, they are that the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the state, with the benefit of all permissible favorable inferences. If the trial judge finds substantial evidence, regardless of weight, of each essential element of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McClarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. BlueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. HemphillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API