Legal Opinion

State v. Richmond

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of compulsory nonsuit made at the close of the State’s case. Defendant offered no evidence.

The indictment is drawn in the language of G.S. 14-202.1, which reads in part: “Any person over 16 years of age who, with intent to commit an unnatural sexual act, shall take, or attempt to take, any immoral, improper, or indecent liberties with any child of either sex, under the age of 16 years, * * *, shall, for the first offense, be guilty of a misdemeanor “ * In order to convict a defendant for the offense charged the State’s evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  2. State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. LangloisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. People v. BrandtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. BrandtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API