Legal Opinion

Stover Bank v. Welpman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 29, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case, at the close of plaintiff's evidence, the trial court gave the peremptory instruction offered by defendant, afterward set aside the involuntary nonsuit taken, and defendant appealed. Upon appeal, the Kansas City Court of Appeals ruled that the court erred in setting aside the involuntary nonsuit; but, deeming its decision to be in conflict with a ruling of the St. Louis Court of Appeals, transferred the cause to this court for determination.

The suit is upon a promissory note in the sum of $1100 executed on December 15, 1920, by the defendant, Louis Welpman, and payable to H.K.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dibert v. D'ArcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Oleon v. Rosenbloom & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Boeka v. NuellaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Vansandt v. HobbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hoover v. May Department Stores Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Salitan v. Carter, Ealey and DinwiddieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. Home Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. Bradburn v. Wyoming Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Moseley v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API