Hamilton v. Montgomery County Bd. of Educ.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DE MENT, District Judge.
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (“Motion”), which was filed August 17, 2000. Plaintiff filed a Response on September 6, 2000, and Defendants filed a Reply on September 12, 2000. After careful consideration of the arguments of counsel, the relevant law, and the record as a whole, the court finds that Defendants’ Motion is due to be granted in part and denied in part.
I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
The court exercises subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nagle v. MarronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Leonard J. Trejo v. Edward J. Shoben, Jessie G. Delia, Larry R. Faulkner, Louis F. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Lewis v. Eufaula City Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Bernstein v. Sephora, Div. of DFS Group LPDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Bryant v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.