Legal Opinion
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 12, 1994No. 90 Civ. 3881 (PKL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
The defendants in this action (collectively, “United Artists”) seek summary judgment on defendants’ claim for attorney’s fees. Plaintiff (“AT & T”) moves to dismiss the claim for attorney’s fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 1 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants plaintiffs motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).
BACKGROUND
On May 14, 1990, United Artists petitioned the Federal Communications…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dorothy C. Parker v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Turner v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SpillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Curran v. Mackay Radio & Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Conboy v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Crow Creek Sioux Tribal CourtDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United Artists Payphone Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. United Artists Payphone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Conboy v. At&T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001