Legal Opinion
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Spiller
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 21, 1927No. 577PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Me. .Justice Brandéis
delivered the opinion of the ■Court. •
This is a motion by Spiller to amend the judgment of this Court and retax costs in St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. v. Spiller, 274 U. S. 304, which was decided on May 16, 1927. ' The October Term, 1926, closed, on June 6. Under Rule 31, the issue of the mandate was necessarily deferred until after the close of the term, as no order shortening the time for issue had been made. It was filed in the office of the clerk of the Circuit Court of Appeals on August 4, 1927. This motion, filed August 22, 1927, was submitted on the first day of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The PalmyraSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SpillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Bank of Kentucky v. Wistar, Price, & WistarSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Baldwin v. Scott County Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Coyle Lines, Inc. v. United States. United States v. Coyle Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- South Carolina Asparagus Growers' Ass'n v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.