Bruno v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, together with three other defendants, were charged in the indictment *417with having conspired to manufacture, transport, and possess intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Prom the judgment of conviction they have brought this appeal. Following the description of the conspiracy, the indictment specified four overt acts as having been committed by the defendants in pursuance, furtherance, and execution of the conspiracy.
In appellants’ brief it is insisted that there is no evidence to support the first overt act. We believe…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Stephens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Donner v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Bill Lee Cummings, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- McNabb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Lynch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935