Legal Opinion

Townsend v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 8, 1939No. Nos. 6847-6849, 6905PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

The evidence in the two appeals sub judice reminds us of the famous description of the annual ball of the Mulligan Association. According to the well-known contemporary historian, M. R. Werner, a Tammany Judge at that fiesta “led through the happy mazes of the grand march a thousand pimps * * * and prostitutes, to the blatant crying of the band”, McClure’s Magazine, Vol. 33, p. 132; Werner, Tammany Hall, p. 501. We quote that phrase because the record discloses that the appellants do not cavil at the characterization. They concede, as we understand it, that three…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. People v. . SpragueNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Dowdy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  5. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Affronti v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  2. Carroll v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Skiskowski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. NettlCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  5. Gormley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API